Hello,

With the upcoming release of the new GNOME 2.12, I want to say a couple of things... 1. Arch is said to do not have a default desktop environment - even so, I was left under the impression that a lot more work goes into building quality KDE packages than GNOME's, which is somewhat acceptable as I'm aware of the fact that most people use KDE anyway. But you could at least personalize GNOME with Arch splashsreens and default wallpaper the way you do it with KDE. You could include be bug reporting tool in GNOME's menu and so on. I noticed that even Xfce was more personalized than GNOME by default... Than spend some time verifying that all is working at least half as good as it should, for KDE runs perfectly in Arch in most ways, but GNOME has many issues... 2. Why is the KDE package installing all sorts of useless apps and GNOME without the gnome-extras package is barely useful... I for example know how to take care of things, but many user might not know... 3.If the maintainers are too busy with other stuff to produce quality builds of GNOME maybe we should start a small project - something like FreeRock and DropLine to provide the de facto standard GNOME for Arch Linux...

That's all from me folks. I'd like to congratulate all the Arch core developers and maintainers which with they work have proven that they may be outnumbered but they are never outgunned ;)

Best Regards,
Bozhidar

P.S. I still hope that someone can give me some advise as to what is the problem with my current 2.10.2 installation of GNOME, if it isn't bad packaging...

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to