[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:46:20AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Lefebvre wrote:
ya... well... if Microsoft does it that way, it must be the right
way, no?
Yes, it must be :). But KDE and Gnome aren't better. They try to
build something like "My Computer" and other things known from $M --
this sucks.
Matthias-Christian
I wish someone with half a brain could tell me what was wrong with
/mnt ?
I think it's really very simple.
/mnt/ does what it has been doing since day 1.
/media/ handles dynamically added new devices.
Aren't you glad that /mnt/ isn't infested by suprises? I am.
--
vk
Nope. Glad is not a word I would use to describe the inconvenience of
adding a new level of silliness.
Very best regards;
Bob Finch
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
In someways I guess it does make sense but then again it seems like
simplification for the sake of simplification. However, when it comes
to a nice clean space for DEs and apps to mount removeable media in line
with a recognised standard then that does make much more sense.
Phil
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
