Hey I got a great idea: Why not allow someone to install zsh after the initial installation ?
That way the (proper) and "industry-wide" standard of bash shell can be kept, with no problems related to having an "odd" non-standard shell installed. And those that want zsh can install this themselves. I know this is a radical thought, but just maybe it might work. (Now I will remove my tongue from my cheek, so to speak, and ignore the rest of this thread.) Not so anonymous > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:37:34AM -0500, Martin Lefebvre wrote: >>On 12/21/05, Patrick Leslie Polzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> zsh is a superset of bash and much more powerful. >> >>Well, since you seem to know zsh very well, let me ask you this: can >> zsh keep an history log across sessions, and if so, how? > > How do you mean "across sessions"? > > This will keep a history across sequential sessions: > > HISTSIZE=500 > SAVEHIST=200 > HISTFILE=~/.zhist > > I don't think it can keep history between concurrent sessions. > > /M > > -- > Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://therning.org/magnus > > Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish. > Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship > by patent law on written works. > > On a word boundary, Luke, don't just hack at it. ... The byte- saber is > the ceremonial weapon of the Red-Eye Knight. It is used to trim > offensive lines of code. Handwaving won't get you anywhere. Attune > yourself with the Source. > -- Steve Tarr and Alan Hastings _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
