> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of bardo > Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 12:19 PM > To: General Discusson about Arch Linux > Subject: Re: [arch] xorg 7.0 migration ... a report... > > > 2006/1/6, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > links is your friend ;) > > > > you mean the browser? > > Yeah. You can use it from a console to write your mails, and if you > have an active framebuffer you can always take links-g from the AUR, > which is like having a graphical web browser.
Cool tool! But ... I don't get the need for it. If you want a graphical browser, then why not run one (e.g., firefox) under X? I assume if someone's using a console-based browser then they either a) they either can't use X (i.e., not installed, running remotely and don't want to hog bandwidth), or b) don't want to (i.e., prefer not seeing images). Is there a need for this that I'm not seeing? DR ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml ============================================================================== _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
