http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3898

On 2/4/06, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, looks like the new boost provides Boost.Jam which is a
> replacement for jam.  I guess it should conflict and provide it.
>
> On 2/4/06, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   boost: /usr/bin/jam: exists in filesystem
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] damir]# pacman -Qo /usr/bin/jam
> > /usr/bin/jam is owned by jam 2.5-1
> >
> > (i wanted to rebuild source-highlight that depends on =boost-1.33.1-2)
> >
> > - D
> >
> > --
> > Ask the Wombat!
> >
> > Q: What is a kiss?
> > A: Well, this basically sums up your average Internet user, right
> > there.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>


--
A mind all logic is like a knife all blade.
It makes the hand bleed that uses it.

-- Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941)

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to