> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:07:46 +0000 > Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sander has just raised this on the forum - >> >> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=19925 >> >> and I thought I'd bring it to the list as well. Are any of the devs >> aware of this already? Whether they are or not, what's the protocol in >> situations like this? >> >> Tom K. > > I'm not fully following you here... > > Because it's i686 optimized, tries to stay bleeding edge but fairly > stable and fast, lightweight, and flexible it has to be a rip off of > Arch? Or are you complaining that they ripped off our wording? > > From what I can tell, it uses a different package manager. For someone > to have ripped us off, they'd have to convert a good chunk of our > packages over to their own format. Why bother? > > Now, if you're just complaining about the words, I'm pretty sure Judd > hasn't trademarked "fast, lightweight, and flexible", "bleeding edge", > "stable", or "i686", so I don't understand what the issue is... > > Jason
Jason is right, Judd did not copyright/trademark those things. I DID. So.....you all owe me BIG BUCKS, and I will be coming to your town soon to collect. Very best regards; Not so anonymous. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
