On Tue, 16 May 2006 20:10:31 +0200, Rohan Dhruva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/16/06, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> well, pacman will give priority to packages in the repos, as they are >> the >> trusted source >> >> >> >> On 5/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:25:38 +0200, Martin Lefebvre >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > In /etc/pacman.conf, you can add wine to IgnorePkg >> > >> > or i could use --ignore wine on cmd-line, but that's not really the >> point >> > is it. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > arch mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Lefebvre >> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> WWW: https://sigterm.homeunix.com >> Registered Linux #349269 >> >> "Sorry isn't an excuse when you do something stupid on purpose." >> _______________________________________________ >> arch mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >> >> >> > > In wine it is intentional -- read the cvs entry. > http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/x11/wine/PKGBUILD?rev=1.14&cvsroot=Extra&only_with_tag=CURRENT&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > It says on the top "force=y", so pacman will force a downgrade. I am > sure that is the case in the other packages too, but I have not > checked. > > Rohan. > > buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the pkgbuild in abs and built from that one, so my wine 0.9.13 which has the force flag sat to 'y' still shouldn't be "upgraded" by an older release, should it? Because that would be a bug wouldn't it? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
