On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:50:47 +0200, Rohan Dhruva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:19:32 +0200, Aaron Griffin >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > On 7/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:09:27 +0200, Rohan Dhruva >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On 7/10/06, Comick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Xorg 7.1 has been released some time ago, but it is not present in >> >> >> current, nor in testing. >> >> >> >> >> >> Is planned an upgrade soon? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks :) >> >> > >> >> > I think the upgrade is stalled since the nvidia and ati binary >> drivers >> >> > dont work with xorg 7.1 >> >> > >> >> >> >> frugalware just updated and told everyone that needed nvidia and ati >> >> drivers >> >> to not update. >> >> >> >> can't we do the same? >> > >> > Sure, but that's kinda dumb. If you'd like to see how dumb, I can go >> > rebuild about 30 packages in [current] against deps that aren't there >> > and just post a news item that says "hey don't update if you need >> > _this_". We can watch the flood of "wtf" comments pour in. >> > >> Do you really think that is what frugalware did or are you just playing >> dumb? >> > > No, IIRC, that is exactly what Frugalware did. > *confused* Wouldn't it just be ati and nvidia packages who would not work with the new xorg in /testing(if 7.1 went there ofc)? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
