Georg Grabler wrote:
> Heya.
> 
> Beryl - merged with compiz
> whole games section - might should be moved to a games repo, maintained by TUs
> gtk-gnutella - i don't see the point using a specific gnutella client
> if a lot of other programs handle multiple protocols fine.
> KOffice - rarely used compared to OpenOffice
> Minimize kernel patchsets supported by [extra]
> Networkmanager - too unstable anyway
> Openbox or fluxbox - the difference is minimal anyway
> Perl modules which are not base of some program / script
> tkcvs - anyone still using this tool?
> xmms + addins - should not be that heavily used anymore

I still "heavily" use XMMS: it's still the best music player around. The 
new GTK2 players have these annoying quirks which the original XMMS 
doesn't have.

> remove web-based tools (as phpbb). I think they can also be downloaded
> / unzipped by every guy himself.
> Remove gaim (pigdin is already in)
> bittornado (in favor of deluge, ktorrent)
> 
> Hmh, that's what i've found. A bit less as it seems. Generally,
> software like bittorrent clients and so on can be moved down to
> [community] in my eyes.

The point why there are so many torrent clients to choose from is so 
that you would have the choice! Bad idea imho.

> 
> On 5/9/07, Douglas Soares de Andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Aaron Griffin escreveu:
>>> Ok all, I'm going to compile a list of packages that we're going to
>>> try to get rid of.  The reason being that our man power for
>>> maintaining all these packages is pretty low.
>>>
>>> So, what I'd like to do to start this off is the following.  From you
>>> guys, the end users, can you let me know what packages in extra you
>>> think don't really belong there?
>>>
>>> What I mean is this:  often times, there are packages that come along
>>> which are so much better than something else, a vast majority of users
>>> jump ship for the new app.  Take, for instance, openbox/fluxbox.
>>>
>>> To you devs, please let me know if you feel any of your packages don't
>>> belong either - you probably know these packages better than other
>>> people.  This will speed up my job in compiling this list (I already
>>> have a few of my own packages listed).
>>>
>>> By this Friday, I'd like to have a list complete so we can begin
>>> moving some things to community / unsupported as we see fit.  This
>>> will require some TU input as well - if you guys see a package you'd
>>> want to maintain, we can move it to community actually easier than
>>> moving it to the AUR.
>>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> If it is not a problem i would like to maintain the set of pyqt, sip and
>> qscintilla packages and some python others if needed.
>>
>> I can also help with maintaining gnome, if needed.
>>
>> As i use this tools a lot.
>>
>>> So anyway, expect some packages to be moving out of extra this weekend.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aaron
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> arch mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to