On 04/04/2012 03:41 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:14:15PM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: >> >> >> From a users perspective, it would be best for it to work on both 16 & >> 17 for a period of time. > > I believe that this makes "it" a "them" - at lease for vdsm this would > require two rpms built and QAed. I hope we can avoid that, and release > only one stack, preferably over f17.
What if we got virt-preview updated again so that it contained the right packages so that the same version of vdsm would work on both: * f16 + virt_preview * f17 Then we can have oVirt Node built based on f16 + virt_preview for now, and eventually move to pure f17. Dave/Cole, is updating virt-preview something you guys can help with? Perry > Note that even though vdsm's HEAD requires stuff that is out of f16, > the vdsm team could produce stable vdsm builds for whatever platform > that we choose. > _______________________________________________ > Arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
