On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:29:41PM -0400, Perry Myers wrote: > On 04/04/2012 03:41 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:14:15PM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > >> > >> > >> From a users perspective, it would be best for it to work on both 16 & > >> 17 for a period of time. > > > > I believe that this makes "it" a "them" - at lease for vdsm this would > > require two rpms built and QAed. I hope we can avoid that, and release > > only one stack, preferably over f17. > > What if we got virt-preview updated again so that it contained the right > packages so that the same version of vdsm would work on both: > > * f16 + virt_preview > * f17 > > Then we can have oVirt Node built based on f16 + virt_preview for now, > and eventually move to pure f17. > > Dave/Cole, is updating virt-preview something you guys can help with?
Sure, virt-preview is sorely due for an update, and this is good motivation to do it. Dave > Perry > > > Note that even though vdsm's HEAD requires stuff that is out of f16, > > the vdsm team could produce stable vdsm builds for whatever platform > > that we choose. > > _______________________________________________ > > Arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
