On 04/04/2012 10:41 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:14:15PM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
From a users perspective, it would be best for it to work on both 16&
17 for a period of time.
I believe that this makes "it" a "them" - at lease for vdsm this would
require two rpms built and QAed. I hope we can avoid that, and release
only one stack, preferably over f17.
Note that even though vdsm's HEAD requires stuff that is out of f16,
the vdsm team could produce stable vdsm builds for whatever platform
that we choose.
need to see amount of overhead for engine side, as it will be moving to
new jboss rpm's (which were just approved yesterday in f17).
I don't see anyone pushing jboss rpm's for f16 at this point, and need
to see if makes sense to continue maintaining the ovirt-jboss rpm which
was created as a temporary solution (and the setup support for it)
_______________________________________________
Arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
