Adam,  

The rule is that this should be allowed.  That is, one node in the reference 
data graph can serve as a controlled vocabulary for more than one resource 
graph node (of domain type.)  As you pointed out the the inverse is true as 
well.

>From the perspective of an initial data load, you can control which resource 
>graph nodes are “powered” by which authority documents using the 
>ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv file which lives in the same folder as all of the 
>authority document cvs’s.   

The instructions for how to do this are on step 9 in the docs here: 
http://arches3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/arches-data/#reference-data-graph  

Best,
Adam

--  
Adam Lodge
Geospatial Systems Consultant
Farallon Geographics


On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Adam Cox wrote:

> Hello all, I've been working on a graph, and I set it up so that a number of 
> different new nodes (CRITERION_A_SCORE.E60, CRITERION_B_SCORE.E60, 
> CRITERION_C_SCORE.E60, etc.) all reference the same authority document 
> (EVALUATION_SCORE_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32), which is actually just the numbers 
> 0-3.  I thought this would work, but I'm not so sure anymore.  The following 
> has happened in the RDM:
>  
> In Arches, Evaluation Score is listed correctly, with the numbers 0-3 
> included as concepts.
> In Dropdown Lists, Evaluation Score is not listed, nor are any of the 
> Criterion nodes.
> In Entity Nodes, the Criterion nodes are listed.  Strangely, they have an 
> arrow as if they were dropdowns, but don't contain any narrower concepts (see 
> below).
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> My conclusion is that there is a problem with having multiple nodes reference 
> the same authority document, though I don't see any mention of that in the 
> documentation.  (This is different than seeing the same node reference the 
> same authority document (NAME_TYPE.E55 > NAME_TYPE_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32) in 
> multiple graphs.)
>  
> In this specific case I think I'll do away with the authority documents and 
> just control the input in the forms, but clarification on the general rules 
> would be much appreciated for future reference.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
>  
> --  
> -- To post, send email to [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]). To unsubscribe, send email to 
> [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]). For more information, 
> visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
> ---  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Arches Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send 
email to [email protected]. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to