Hi Adam, thanks for the reply. I did have the ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv correctly constructed, as per the documentation (I made a script to build it off of the resource graphs). I will double check it though. Do you know what would have caused the behavior I saw in the RDM? Or, why was nothing listed in the Dropdown Lists? If it really seems like it must be the ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv I'll go back check it out.
BTW, the error that I thought was caused by this seems to be something else, so I've got some more troubleshooting to do... Thanks! On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Adam Lodge <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam, > > The rule is that this should be allowed. That is, one node in the > reference data graph can serve as a controlled vocabulary for more than one > resource graph node (of domain type.) As you pointed out the the inverse > is true as well. > > From the perspective of an initial data load, you can control which > resource graph nodes are “powered” by which authority documents using the > ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv file which lives in the same folder as all of the > authority document cvs’s. > > The instructions for how to do this are on step 9 in the docs here: > http://arches3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/arches-data/#reference-data-graph > > Best, > Adam > > -- > Adam Lodge > Geospatial Systems Consultant > Farallon Geographics > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Adam Cox wrote: > > Hello all, I've been working on a graph, and I set it up so that a number > of different new nodes > (CRITERION_A_SCORE.E60, CRITERION_B_SCORE.E60, CRITERION_C_SCORE.E60, etc.) > all reference the same authority document > (EVALUATION_SCORE_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32), which is actually just the > numbers 0-3. I thought this would work, but I'm not so sure anymore. The > following has happened in the RDM: > > In Arches, Evaluation Score is listed correctly, with the numbers 0-3 > included as concepts. > In Dropdown Lists, Evaluation Score is not listed, nor are any of the > Criterion nodes. > In Entity Nodes, the Criterion nodes are listed. Strangely, they have an > arrow as if they were dropdowns, but don't contain any narrower concepts > (see below). > > > <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-XgBrGCpCSSo/Vkn_Q9rd4vI/AAAAAAAAAYQ/cfgBEKJ2ayk/s1600/entities.PNG> > > > My conclusion is that there is a problem with having multiple nodes > reference the same authority document, though I don't see any mention of > that in the documentation. (This is different than seeing the same node > reference the same authority document (NAME_TYPE.E55 > > NAME_TYPE_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32) in multiple graphs.) > > In this specific case I think I'll do away with the authority documents > and just control the input in the forms, but clarification on the general > rules would be much appreciated for future reference. > > Thanks! > > > -- > -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, > send email to [email protected]. For more > information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Arches Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
