Hi Shazni,

Service creation using WSDL URLs was already implemented in an older
version of ES. But there was a problem with service creation using a zip
file of WSDLs [1]. Will send you a separate mail with exiting code blocks
for service creation using a WSDL URL.

[1]. [Architecture] Jaggery unzips all folders?

Regards,
Chandana


On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Chandana Napagoda <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Shazni,
>
> Service creation using WSDL URLs was already implemented in an older
> version of ES. But there was a problem with service creation using a zip
> file of WSDLs [1]. Will send you a separate mail with exiting code blocks
> for service creation using a WSDL URL.
>
> [1]. [Architecture] Jaggery unzips all folders?
>
> Regards,
> Chandana
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Senaka,
>>
>> First of all thanks for the information.
>>
>> I already had a call with Chandana together with SameeraM regarding this.
>> It was understood that the work Chandana did (which was working earlier in
>> an older version of enterprise-store), wouldn't directly imply with the
>> latest modifications done in the enterprise store. @Chandana, please
>> confirm. With the latest changes in the enterprise store (which is more
>> greg focused) Chandana's work could be achieved with comparatively minimal
>> work with the extension points provided in the enterprise store. @SameeraM
>> - please confirm.
>>
>> +1 for an offline discussion and figure out what needs to be done.
>>
>>
>>
>> Shazni Nazeer
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer
>>
>> Mob : +94 777737331
>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please find my responses in-line.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Senaka etal,
>>>>
>>>> I'm in the process of adding the service UI to the service store
>>>> feature that would be included Governance Registry. This involves extending
>>>> already available service UI in the store feature to make it compatible
>>>> with the Governance Registries model, in adding a service from the
>>>> extension point given by the store feature. I've currently performed
>>>> following. (Note: The changes are being changed/tested currently in the
>>>> enterprise-store as the store feature in the GREG doesn't allow yet to
>>>> login to the publisher and store. Once it's done, the service extensions
>>>> need to be placed inside the publisher app inside the GREG.
>>>>
>>>> As it was decided to have minimal information to be available in the
>>>> service UI, had to hide/modify the default view, which contains all the
>>>> details that we find in the management console of the Governance Registry.
>>>>
>>>> The default service UI from store doesn't add the services in the
>>>> correct path when the namespace of the service is provided. That's
>>>> corrected in the extension point.
>>>>
>>>> Apart from these I've few more concerns.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Once the service is published it would show up in the service store
>>>> in a new tab. As our G-Reg's service rxt doesn't have a thumbnail field,
>>>> the service store show up services without a thumbnail. Is it o.k to leave
>>>> it like this for the time being? Or else what can we do on this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, as Ruchira pointed out as well, I wouldn't worry too much about
>>> this right now. We can keep the default icon as it is.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. As we know services can be added from a wsdl url. The current level
>>>> of work doesn't allow adding service's from a wsdl. Do we need to have the
>>>> ability to add services from wsdl's in service UI? Or should we create a
>>>> separate rxt for wsdl's as in the G-Reg?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that Chandana already started doing this, and
>>> perhaps completed some of it. If you are unaware of this, its best to get
>>> him involved in a call first and discuss what was done and what you can
>>> use.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Senaka; Do you have some time to have a call on this to discuss
>>>> further? If so what would the convenient time for you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Based on above, if you already have an understanding and expanding what
>>> Chandana was working on, then +1 for setting up a call next week. Lets
>>> discuss offline and find a that works for everybody.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Senaka.
>>>
>>>> Shazni Nazeer
>>>>
>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>
>>>> Mob : +94 777737331
>>>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>>>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando*
>>> Software Architect; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>> <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1
>>> 408 754 7388 <%2B1%20408%20754%207388>; ext: 51736*;
>>>
>>>
>>> *M: +44 782 741 1966 <%2B44%20782%20741%201966> Linked-In:
>>> http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>> <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Chandana Napagoda*
> Senior Software Engineer
> WSO2 Inc. - http://wso2.org
>
> *Email  :  [email protected] <[email protected]> **Mobile : +94718169299
> <%2B94718169299>*
>
> *Blog  :    http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com <http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com>*
>
>


-- 
*Chandana Napagoda*
Senior Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc. - http://wso2.org

*Email  :  [email protected] <[email protected]>**Mobile : +94718169299*

*Blog  :    http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com <http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com>*
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to