Hi Shazni,

Has to be dependent. And also needs to sync with this new Metadata model
that we are talking about.

Thanks,
Senaka.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> In the extension that I was working I now have made the necessary changes
> to the publisher end so that we could add services and wsdl from the
> publisher and view those in a list. When clicked on the relevant service or
> wsdl it shows up an overview page with details. The wsdl we add through the
> publisher also creates the relevant service. The service support
> 'ServiceLifecycle' by default, which is not the case with the publisher end
> in ES feature, which attaches the store life cycle. We are yet to finalize
> the life-cycle to be associated and how to proceed with that.
>
> Going on to the the store end, how would it be best viewed? Should we be
> having two different tabs for service and wsdl? Or will it be concise
> showing the wsdl in the service view it self as both are dependant? I'm
> planning to work on the store end and your input on this will be
> appreciated.
>
> thanks
>
> Shazni Nazeer
>
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> Mob : +94 777737331
> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Subash,
>>
>> Well I don't think that's just it. We had something running for the 2013
>> WSO2Con, and Chandana was looking into moving that into the Store as well.
>> Not sure whether he did that.
>>
>> Apart from this, in terms of plans, what I had in mind is what we
>> discussed offline.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Senaka.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Subash Chaturanga <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Senaka et al,
>>>
>>> Had a quick look at what Shazni did compared to Chandana's one. In
>>> provider's view we seems in line with what was there initially with the
>>> reduced service RXT. @Senaka, anyway with the unified gov model, we
>>> probably end up a more reduced version for service and with some updates.
>>> Let's keep it till then.
>>>
>>> For Doc links, even in service store we have this same old 3 doc link
>>> field with type/url/comment.  @Ruchira is it possible to have something for
>>> documentation like whats there in AM ?
>>>
>>> @Senaka
>>> Have we thought about the store front for services ? Currently (even
>>> with Chandana's impl) you can't do anything in store other than
>>> tag/rate/comment.
>>> What were the plans you had on service store ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chandana,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information.
>>>>
>>>> Yes. That's what I'm trying to achieve at the moment. With the new ES,
>>>> first we need to be able to add a service through a wsdl url. In the
>>>> earlier work, was that happening in the same service UI? If so what would
>>>> be the case for the other fields such as the name-space? Was it getting
>>>> hidden dynamically or is it simply getting ignored when the wsdl url is
>>>> provided?
>>>>
>>>> Regarding addition of wsdl addition by zip files, there can still be
>>>> issues as you mentioned. Depending on that, we might not consider that and
>>>> wsdl addition using url for the first milestone.
>>>>
>>>> Appreciate your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> Shazni Nazeer
>>>>
>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>
>>>> Mob : +94 777737331
>>>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>>>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Chandana Napagoda <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Shazni,
>>>>>
>>>>> Service creation using WSDL URLs was already implemented in an older
>>>>> version of ES. But there was a problem with service creation using a zip
>>>>> file of WSDLs [1]. Will send you a separate mail with exiting code blocks
>>>>> for service creation using a WSDL URL.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]. [Architecture] Jaggery unzips all folders?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Chandana
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Chandana Napagoda <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Shazni,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Service creation using WSDL URLs was already implemented in an older
>>>>>> version of ES. But there was a problem with service creation using a zip
>>>>>> file of WSDLs [1]. Will send you a separate mail with exiting code blocks
>>>>>> for service creation using a WSDL URL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]. [Architecture] Jaggery unzips all folders?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Chandana
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Senaka,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First of all thanks for the information.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already had a call with Chandana together with SameeraM regarding
>>>>>>> this. It was understood that the work Chandana did (which was working
>>>>>>> earlier in an older version of enterprise-store), wouldn't directly 
>>>>>>> imply
>>>>>>> with the latest modifications done in the enterprise store. @Chandana,
>>>>>>> please confirm. With the latest changes in the enterprise store (which 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> more greg focused) Chandana's work could be achieved with comparatively
>>>>>>> minimal work with the extension points provided in the enterprise store.
>>>>>>> @SameeraM - please confirm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for an offline discussion and figure out what needs to be done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shazni Nazeer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mob : +94 777737331
>>>>>>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>>>>>>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Senaka Fernando <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please find my responses in-line.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Senaka etal,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm in the process of adding the service UI to the service store
>>>>>>>>> feature that would be included Governance Registry. This involves 
>>>>>>>>> extending
>>>>>>>>> already available service UI in the store feature to make it 
>>>>>>>>> compatible
>>>>>>>>> with the Governance Registries model, in adding a service from the
>>>>>>>>> extension point given by the store feature. I've currently performed
>>>>>>>>> following. (Note: The changes are being changed/tested currently in 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> enterprise-store as the store feature in the GREG doesn't allow yet to
>>>>>>>>> login to the publisher and store. Once it's done, the service 
>>>>>>>>> extensions
>>>>>>>>> need to be placed inside the publisher app inside the GREG.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As it was decided to have minimal information to be available in
>>>>>>>>> the service UI, had to hide/modify the default view, which contains 
>>>>>>>>> all the
>>>>>>>>> details that we find in the management console of the Governance 
>>>>>>>>> Registry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The default service UI from store doesn't add the services in the
>>>>>>>>> correct path when the namespace of the service is provided. That's
>>>>>>>>> corrected in the extension point.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apart from these I've few more concerns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. Once the service is published it would show up in the service
>>>>>>>>> store in a new tab. As our G-Reg's service rxt doesn't have a 
>>>>>>>>> thumbnail
>>>>>>>>> field, the service store show up services without a thumbnail. Is it 
>>>>>>>>> o.k to
>>>>>>>>> leave it like this for the time being? Or else what can we do on this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, as Ruchira pointed out as well, I wouldn't worry too much
>>>>>>>> about this right now. We can keep the default icon as it is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. As we know services can be added from a wsdl url. The current
>>>>>>>>> level of work doesn't allow adding service's from a wsdl. Do we need 
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> have the ability to add services from wsdl's in service UI? Or should 
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> create a separate rxt for wsdl's as in the G-Reg?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was under the impression that Chandana already started doing
>>>>>>>> this, and perhaps completed some of it. If you are unaware of this, its
>>>>>>>> best to get him involved in a call first and discuss what was done and 
>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>> you can use.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @Senaka; Do you have some time to have a call on this to discuss
>>>>>>>>> further? If so what would the convenient time for you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Based on above, if you already have an understanding and expanding
>>>>>>>> what Chandana was working on, then +1 for setting up a call next week. 
>>>>>>>> Lets
>>>>>>>> discuss offline and find a that works for everybody.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Senaka.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Shazni Nazeer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mob : +94 777737331
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando*
>>>>>>>> Software Architect; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>>>>>>>> <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P:
>>>>>>>> +1 408 754 7388 <%2B1%20408%20754%207388>; ext: 51736*;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *M: +44 782 741 1966 <%2B44%20782%20741%201966> Linked-In:
>>>>>>>> http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>>>>>>>> <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise .
>>>>>>>> Middleware
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Chandana Napagoda*
>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>> WSO2 Inc. - http://wso2.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Email  :  [email protected] <[email protected]> **Mobile :
>>>>>> +94718169299 <%2B94718169299>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Blog  :    http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com
>>>>>> <http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Chandana Napagoda*
>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>> WSO2 Inc. - http://wso2.org
>>>>>
>>>>> *Email  :  [email protected] <[email protected]> **Mobile :
>>>>> +94718169299 <%2B94718169299>*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Blog  :    http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com
>>>>> <http://cnapagoda.blogspot.com>*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> /subash
>>>
>>> *Subash Chaturanga*
>>> Senior Software Engineer & Lead WSO2 Governance Registry
>>> Platform TG; WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com
>>> Contact:
>>> email: [email protected]
>>> blog:  http://subashsdm.blogspot.com/
>>> twitter: @subash89
>>> phone: +9477 2225922
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando*
>> Software Architect; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>
>>
>>
>> * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
>> <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1
>> 408 754 7388 <%2B1%20408%20754%207388>; ext: 51736*;
>>
>>
>> *M: +44 782 741 1966 <%2B44%20782%20741%201966> Linked-In:
>> http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
>> <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>
>


-- 


*[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com>Senaka Fernando*
Solutions Architect; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com



*Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org
<http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1 408
754 7388; ext: 51736*;


*M: +44 782 741 1966Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando
<http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to