Hi all, Please find my responses in-line.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Shazni Nazeer <[email protected]> wrote: > Senaka etal, > > I'm in the process of adding the service UI to the service store feature > that would be included Governance Registry. This involves extending already > available service UI in the store feature to make it compatible with the > Governance Registries model, in adding a service from the extension point > given by the store feature. I've currently performed following. (Note: The > changes are being changed/tested currently in the enterprise-store as the > store feature in the GREG doesn't allow yet to login to the publisher and > store. Once it's done, the service extensions need to be placed inside the > publisher app inside the GREG. > > As it was decided to have minimal information to be available in the > service UI, had to hide/modify the default view, which contains all the > details that we find in the management console of the Governance Registry. > > The default service UI from store doesn't add the services in the correct > path when the namespace of the service is provided. That's corrected in the > extension point. > > Apart from these I've few more concerns. > > 1. Once the service is published it would show up in the service store in > a new tab. As our G-Reg's service rxt doesn't have a thumbnail field, the > service store show up services without a thumbnail. Is it o.k to leave it > like this for the time being? Or else what can we do on this. > Well, as Ruchira pointed out as well, I wouldn't worry too much about this right now. We can keep the default icon as it is. > > 2. As we know services can be added from a wsdl url. The current level of > work doesn't allow adding service's from a wsdl. Do we need to have the > ability to add services from wsdl's in service UI? Or should we create a > separate rxt for wsdl's as in the G-Reg? > I was under the impression that Chandana already started doing this, and perhaps completed some of it. If you are unaware of this, its best to get him involved in a call first and discuss what was done and what you can use. > > @Senaka; Do you have some time to have a call on this to discuss further? > If so what would the convenient time for you? > Based on above, if you already have an understanding and expanding what Chandana was working on, then +1 for setting up a call next week. Lets discuss offline and find a that works for everybody. Thanks, Senaka. > Shazni Nazeer > > Senior Software Engineer > > Mob : +94 777737331 > LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer > Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com > -- *[image: http://wso2.com] <http://wso2.com> Senaka Fernando* Software Architect; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com * Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://apache.org <http://apache.org>E-mail: senaka AT wso2.com <http://wso2.com>**P: +1 408 754 7388; ext: 51736*; *M: +44 782 741 1966 Linked-In: http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando <http://linkedin.com/in/senakafernando>*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
