Yes, some sort of PoC would be good. I am not sure what you mean by showing
the Type B messages on the page - so would be great to see it in action or
at least on mockups...
On Aug 14, 2014 8:02 PM, "Dimuthu Leelarathne" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Dmitry Sotnikov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Gayan and Dimuthu,
>>
>> From my perspective, one-off UX exceptions are bad, because they make the
>> UI inconsistent.
>>
>> There are two types of messages:
>> A. High-level external notifications of someone taking some action (e.g.
>> "John created a new app") and
>> B. Low-level ongoing processes happening in AF as result of what the
>> current user clicks ("Creating initial GIT repository", etc.)
>>
>> Type A are more social and shown across team, and only when something is
>> actually successfully finished.
>>
>> Spinning wheels / progress indications are only relevant to type B. These
>> messages are only related to the current particular user and show work in
>> progress, starting immediately once the user clicks something.
>>
>> So from my perspective, either we show both types in one pane, or have
>> two different panes (or other UX metaphors) for the two types.
>>
>
> What I am suggesting is a different approach. Which is to show the type B
> messages on the page itself where the information is related. For example
> the fact that build is in progress should be on the Build & Repo page
> itself. What if we do a POC for the same scenario
>
> 1 - on the wall
> 2 - on the page
>
> And see which is user friendly? I agree two panes are not going to be a
> good solution.
>
> thanks,
> dimuthu
>
>
>> My understanding is that the current idea is to try to re-use the same
>> App Wall for everything, right?
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Gayan Dhanushka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dimuthu,
>>>
>>> I tried a sample implementation to show the implementation on the
>>> application wall. This was done by looking at the content of the message.
>>> It was successful. But this may not be ideal since for different kind of
>>> start-inprogress-ended messages we may need to have different logic.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile I can share some wire frames of the approach suggested above
>>> to show the in progress activities on the pages themselves.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> GayanD
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gayan,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Gayan Dhanushka <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dimuthu,
>>>>>
>>>>> Following are a set of actions that we want to give
>>>>> "started-inprogress-ended" messages and places where we would put the
>>>>> spinning wheel and messages.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Application Creation - User home near the application thumbnail
>>>>> (This is already implemented)
>>>>> 2) Application Upload - Application creation page (This is already
>>>>> implemented. Spinning wheel is shown on the application creation page 
>>>>> until
>>>>> the application is uploaded)
>>>>> 3) Build - Repos Builds page near last build status
>>>>> 4) Deployment - Repos Builds page near last deploy id
>>>>> 5) Promote / Demote - Lifecycle page under the particular version
>>>>>
>>>>> I am tentative on having an in progress state for resource creation
>>>>> since it does not take much time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It doesn't take much time in Dev setups. But takes considerable time in
>>>> Cloud. I think for resources we need to give "started" and "ended" 
>>>> messages.
>>>>
>>>> @ Dmitry: What do you think about the new proposal? Giving
>>>> progress-reporting on the page itself, rather than on the wall?
>>>>
>>>> We can do some wireframes and then can finalise. WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> dimuthu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What are your thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Gayan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Gayan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to our offline discussion, then lets do this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 - Identify and list all actions that we want to give
>>>>>> "started-inprogress-ended" messages
>>>>>> 2 - Identify on which sections we are going to give feedback -
>>>>>> spinning icon with messages
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If all of us agree, proceed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> dimuthu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Gayan Dhanushka <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dimuthu / Dmitry,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMHO it is not good to use the wall to show on going events. It is
>>>>>>> more meant to show an action which is triggered by a user or an action
>>>>>>> triggered by the app factory system.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently we have build and deployment events which takes some time
>>>>>>> to complete. While I agree the fact that the user must have some 
>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>> of the ongoing processes, shall we move these notifications to the page 
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> self? We can have a small spinning icon on the page itself near last 
>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>> status and deployment id.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Gayan Dhanushka <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Anuruddha / Dimuthu,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The more global this ID is for all the events makes it more
>>>>>>>> consistent. Otherwise we'll have to render these messages according to
>>>>>>>> different parameters which are there in each message. Having said that 
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> need to figure out a common way of doing this. Doing this by looking 
>>>>>>>> at the
>>>>>>>> message content is not a good approach I guess. Need to figure out a 
>>>>>>>> better
>>>>>>>> way of doing this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gayan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good question. How about generating an ID that can be generated
>>>>>>>>> equally from both sides. For example, if it is build then buildID. If 
>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>> deployment then md5 sum. The more unique the the ID is, then we have 
>>>>>>>>> less
>>>>>>>>> work in identifying decoding user/event.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>> dimuthu
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Anuruddha Premalal <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gayan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We'll also need to consider about the failure events while
>>>>>>>>>> tracking the progress.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> eg. Deployment failure should stop the progress of the deployment
>>>>>>>>>> event.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So we'll have to keep track on start, failure and stop status of
>>>>>>>>>> a particular event.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Other concern is assigning UUID's for events. These events are
>>>>>>>>>> not fired from a central point how are we going to associate a UUID 
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> track them?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Anuruddha.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There can be several methods, one being subscription management.
>>>>>>>>>>> However since master branch is shared by all it would be 
>>>>>>>>>>> interesting to
>>>>>>>>>>> know whether a build was triggered on it by all. However even in 
>>>>>>>>>>> the first
>>>>>>>>>>> phase we must filter out activities happening on the fork repos. I 
>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>> the approach Manjula mentioned should be applied to forked repos.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lets add all events to the doc life cycle and issue tracker
>>>>>>>>>>> events as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> dimuthu
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Gayan Dhanushka <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Manjula,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the input. I will try to utilize the above mentioned
>>>>>>>>>>>> method in the second phase when trying to make the app wall more
>>>>>>>>>>>> personalized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> GayanD
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Manjula Rathnayake <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personalized app-wall can be achieved by the way we publish
>>>>>>>>>>>>> activities to social component. In current implementation, we 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> publish
>>>>>>>>>>>>> activities to two contexts called 'foo-user' and 'bar-app' which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendered in wall as 'foo user wall' and 'bar app wall'. We can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>> another context for personalized activities called 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'bar_app-foo_user' which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be rendered in 'bar app wall' only for 'foo-user'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In short, we define contexts for each user for getting a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> personalized app-wall.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Dmitry Sotnikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gayan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, looks like Udara and I are thinking along the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines. :) This is more than just a build. E.g. when I am 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application, there are a lot of things that happen (borrowing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    1. application creation started
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    2. initial git repo creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    3. jenkins space creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    4. issue tracker space creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    5. app authorization in cloud environments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    6. application creation completed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I am creating an app - I'd like to see them all - because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this takes the mystery out of the process and makes me more 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comfortable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the platform.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If my team-member is creating an app - these 6 events and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their progress are just noise. All I need to do is: "Jane 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java app HelloWorld" (if my role allows me to even know that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this new app
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exists).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, obviously this all can be phase two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Gayan Dhanushka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pointing things out. IMO that would be phase two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry. As soon as I complete publishing all the relevant 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look to accommodate the noise-reduction filter as well. WDYT of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion made by Udara in the above reply? I think that is a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Udara,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The point that you are making is valid I think. With the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion made by Dmitry in the above reply I think this will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> come into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GayanD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Udara Rathnayake <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gayan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See my comment in-line.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Gayan Dhanushka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have identified that the events in the doc attached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> herewith are the events which are triggered within each page. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While some of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them are already published, some of them needs to be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social component in order to enhance the user experience and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collaboration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While doing this we have encountered some issues and some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolutions are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed to overcome those issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Problem*: There is no way to track whether a certain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build or a deployment instance triggered by someone is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed.(No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> association between start and finish events for a certain 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance). There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no way to represent an ongoing process. (e.g. application 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creation in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progress, build is in progress etc.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here we have to think about the user experience.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO the user who triggered the build only interested to see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the progress of that particular build, others may be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interested to see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start and the end but not the progress.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The same problem would be applied to any scenario where it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes some time for a certain event to finish and app factory 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capture both start and completion events related to a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular instance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Solution* : Use a UUID to track events which takes time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to complete
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Publishing both start and complete events with the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UUID as a event property would solve the problem. Then by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event content we are able to find whether there is a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completion event for a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certain start event. This would be a global thing so the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notification wall
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logic can be written in such a manner that we need to have a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look at only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the UUID. If we use different mechanisms for tracking start 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and completion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events of different events the notification wall logic would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complex when filtering out the events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://redmine.wso2.com/issues/3065
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GayanD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 071 666 2327
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Udara Rathnayake*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2 Inc. : http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile : +94 772207239
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : http://twitter.com/udarakr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog    : http://udarakr.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 071 666 2327
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry Sotnikov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VP of Cloud; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: [email protected]; cell: +1.949.303.9653
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ; Skype: DSotnikov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <http://wso2.com/events/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manjula Rathnayaka
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile:+94 77 743 1987
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>> 071 666 2327
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Office
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>>>>>>>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>>>>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> *Anuruddha Premalal*
>>>>>>>>>> Software Eng. | WSO2 Inc.
>>>>>>>>>> Mobile : +94710461070
>>>>>>>>>> Web site : www.regilandvalley.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>>>>>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>> http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>> 071 666 2327
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Office
>>>>>>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>>>>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>> http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>> 071 666 2327
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Office
>>>>>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>>>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> http://wso2.com/
>>>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>>>
>>>>> Mobile
>>>>> 071 666 2327
>>>>>
>>>>> Office
>>>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>>>
>>>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>
>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>
>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gayan Dhanuska
>>> Software Engineer
>>> http://wso2.com/
>>> Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>
>>> Mobile
>>> 071 666 2327
>>>
>>> Office
>>> Tel   : 94 11 214 5345
>>>  Fax  : 94 11 214 5300
>>>
>>> Twitter : https://twitter.com/gayanlggd
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dmitry Sotnikov
>> VP of Cloud; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com/
>> email: [email protected]; cell: +1.949.303.9653; Skype: DSotnikov
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>>  <http://wso2.com/events/>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dimuthu Leelarathne
> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>
> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
> email: [email protected]
> Mobile : 0773661935
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to