Because of the backward-compatible of osgi framework, If people uses an
older framework, it should be smooth to update the framework from 4.0, 4.1
to the new version. I think we should not bind ourselves to go forward.

-Rex

2009/11/24 Lin Sun <[email protected]>

> I wonder if we have to live with that prob, otherwise, we won't be
> able to use the latest stuff from the core or compendium, such as the
> BundleTracker util.
>
> Lin
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree to use the osgi artifacts instead of the felix onesm but i'm
> > not sure about using only 4.2
> > If we do that, people using an older framework won't be able to
> > consume aries components...
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 22:18, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I found out that we have a couple of places pull in different level of
> >> osgi core or compendium from different sources.  For example,
> >>
> >> blueprint is using the org.osgi.core 1.4.2 & org.osgi.compendium v1.2
> >> from apache Felix
> >> transaction is using org.osgi.core v4.1 and org.osgi.compendium v4.1
> >> from org.osgi
> >> application is using org.osgi.core v4.2 from org.osgi
> >> jmx is using the org.osgi.core 1.4.2 & org.osgi.compendium v1.2 from
> >> apache Felix
> >>
> >> I'd like to update to the latest version of core and compendium.   How
> >> about we use the following  from the org.osgi which is avail at
> >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/osgi/ to be consistent?
> >>
> >>            <dependency>
> >>                <groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
> >>                <artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId>
> >>                <version>4.2.0</version>
> >>            </dependency>
> >>            <dependency>
> >>                <groupId>org.osgi</groupId>
> >>                <artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId>
> >>                <version>4.2.0</version>
> >>            </dependency>
> >>
> >> Please let me know if you have any objection in the next day or two.
>  Thanks
> >>
> >> Lin
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > ------------------------
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com
> >
>

Reply via email to