Ok cool, I'll make the change for blueprint only for now. Thanks Lin
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > For blueprint, there's no real question because the blueprint api > already depends on 4.2 ... > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 15:52, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes i'd agree with that too, if they can upgrade their framework. >> The question is if they decide to stay with their old version of osgi >> framework, do we want to support them? >> >> Lin >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Rex Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Because of the backward-compatible of osgi framework, If people uses an >>> older framework, it should be smooth to update the framework from 4.0, 4.1 >>> to the new version. I think we should not bind ourselves to go forward. >>> >>> -Rex >>> >>> 2009/11/24 Lin Sun <[email protected]> >>> >>>> I wonder if we have to live with that prob, otherwise, we won't be >>>> able to use the latest stuff from the core or compendium, such as the >>>> BundleTracker util. >>>> >>>> Lin >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I agree to use the osgi artifacts instead of the felix onesm but i'm >>>> > not sure about using only 4.2 >>>> > If we do that, people using an older framework won't be able to >>>> > consume aries components... >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 22:18, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> I found out that we have a couple of places pull in different level of >>>> >> osgi core or compendium from different sources. For example, >>>> >> >>>> >> blueprint is using the org.osgi.core 1.4.2 & org.osgi.compendium v1.2 >>>> >> from apache Felix >>>> >> transaction is using org.osgi.core v4.1 and org.osgi.compendium v4.1 >>>> >> from org.osgi >>>> >> application is using org.osgi.core v4.2 from org.osgi >>>> >> jmx is using the org.osgi.core 1.4.2 & org.osgi.compendium v1.2 from >>>> >> apache Felix >>>> >> >>>> >> I'd like to update to the latest version of core and compendium. How >>>> >> about we use the following from the org.osgi which is avail at >>>> >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/osgi/ to be consistent? >>>> >> >>>> >> <dependency> >>>> >> <groupId>org.osgi</groupId> >>>> >> <artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId> >>>> >> <version>4.2.0</version> >>>> >> </dependency> >>>> >> <dependency> >>>> >> <groupId>org.osgi</groupId> >>>> >> <artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId> >>>> >> <version>4.2.0</version> >>>> >> </dependency> >>>> >> >>>> >> Please let me know if you have any objection in the next day or two. >>>> Thanks >>>> >> >>>> >> Lin >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Guillaume Nodet >>>> > ------------------------ >>>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>> > ------------------------ >>>> > Open Source SOA >>>> > http://fusesource.com >>>> > >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
