For blueprint, there's no real question because the blueprint api already depends on 4.2 ...
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 15:52, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes i'd agree with that too, if they can upgrade their framework. > The question is if they decide to stay with their old version of osgi > framework, do we want to support them? > > Lin > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Rex Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >> Because of the backward-compatible of osgi framework, If people uses an >> older framework, it should be smooth to update the framework from 4.0, 4.1 >> to the new version. I think we should not bind ourselves to go forward. >> >> -Rex >> >> 2009/11/24 Lin Sun <[email protected]> >> >>> I wonder if we have to live with that prob, otherwise, we won't be >>> able to use the latest stuff from the core or compendium, such as the >>> BundleTracker util. >>> >>> Lin >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I agree to use the osgi artifacts instead of the felix onesm but i'm >>> > not sure about using only 4.2 >>> > If we do that, people using an older framework won't be able to >>> > consume aries components... >>> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 22:18, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I found out that we have a couple of places pull in different level of >>> >> osgi core or compendium from different sources. For example, >>> >> >>> >> blueprint is using the org.osgi.core 1.4.2 & org.osgi.compendium v1.2 >>> >> from apache Felix >>> >> transaction is using org.osgi.core v4.1 and org.osgi.compendium v4.1 >>> >> from org.osgi >>> >> application is using org.osgi.core v4.2 from org.osgi >>> >> jmx is using the org.osgi.core 1.4.2 & org.osgi.compendium v1.2 from >>> >> apache Felix >>> >> >>> >> I'd like to update to the latest version of core and compendium. How >>> >> about we use the following from the org.osgi which is avail at >>> >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/osgi/ to be consistent? >>> >> >>> >> <dependency> >>> >> <groupId>org.osgi</groupId> >>> >> <artifactId>org.osgi.core</artifactId> >>> >> <version>4.2.0</version> >>> >> </dependency> >>> >> <dependency> >>> >> <groupId>org.osgi</groupId> >>> >> <artifactId>org.osgi.compendium</artifactId> >>> >> <version>4.2.0</version> >>> >> </dependency> >>> >> >>> >> Please let me know if you have any objection in the next day or two. >>> Thanks >>> >> >>> >> Lin >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Cheers, >>> > Guillaume Nodet >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> > ------------------------ >>> > Open Source SOA >>> > http://fusesource.com >>> > >>> >> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
