I'm very tempted to suggest putting it out separately so people can choose not to consume it reasonably easily. Also I think it is likely that as we progress we may want to use it in more places and having it slightly to one size should make that simpler.
Just my 2 cents worth. Alasdair 2010/1/11 Valentin Mahrwald <[email protected]>: > My current working set has a new converters project under application primed > with the WarToWab conversions, but I suppose it could equally go into the > existing management project. Any thoughts? > > Regards, > > Valentin > > On 11 Jan 2010, at 21:04, Jarek Gawor wrote: > >> Valentin, >> >> Ok, great! Looking forward to your updates. Will the converter be in a >> separate module? >> >> Jarek >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Valentin Mahrwald >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jarek, >>> >>> I have started just yesterday moving it to the new BundleConverter API >>> but I >>> haven't come round to raise a JIRA for it yet :) I am quite happy to >>> continue with the task. >>> >>> My idea was to take the code out of the context of the RFC 66 context it >>> was >>> originally contributed since the RFC 66 bits weren't much more than the >>> conversion logic anyway. >>> >>> Valentin >>> >>> On 11 Jan 2010, at 20:38, Jarek Gawor wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Is anyone planning to migrate the WAR to WAB converter donated by IBM >>>> to trunk any time soon? If not, and if there are no objections I can >>>> work on moving that code to trunk. >>>> >>>> Jarek >>> >>> > > -- Alasdair Nottingham [email protected]
