I prefer to keep them separately too. It is possible that people may just want to consume the webbundle url handler without the app management API.
Lin On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm very tempted to suggest putting it out separately so people can > choose not to consume it reasonably easily. Also I think it is likely > that as we progress we may want to use it in more places and having it > slightly to one size should make that simpler. > > Just my 2 cents worth. > > Alasdair > > 2010/1/11 Valentin Mahrwald <[email protected]>: >> My current working set has a new converters project under application primed >> with the WarToWab conversions, but I suppose it could equally go into the >> existing management project. Any thoughts? >> >> Regards, >> >> Valentin >> >> On 11 Jan 2010, at 21:04, Jarek Gawor wrote: >> >>> Valentin, >>> >>> Ok, great! Looking forward to your updates. Will the converter be in a >>> separate module? >>> >>> Jarek >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Valentin Mahrwald >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jarek, >>>> >>>> I have started just yesterday moving it to the new BundleConverter API >>>> but I >>>> haven't come round to raise a JIRA for it yet :) I am quite happy to >>>> continue with the task. >>>> >>>> My idea was to take the code out of the context of the RFC 66 context it >>>> was >>>> originally contributed since the RFC 66 bits weren't much more than the >>>> conversion logic anyway. >>>> >>>> Valentin >>>> >>>> On 11 Jan 2010, at 20:38, Jarek Gawor wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Is anyone planning to migrate the WAR to WAB converter donated by IBM >>>>> to trunk any time soon? If not, and if there are no objections I can >>>>> work on moving that code to trunk. >>>>> >>>>> Jarek >>>> >>>> >> >> > > > > -- > Alasdair Nottingham > [email protected] >
