Hi Charles, The most current public specification for this is the "Web Container Specification" in this draft: http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-enterprise-early-draft4.pdf
Regards, Graham. 2010/1/12 Charles Moulliard <[email protected]>: > Thxs. > > I have found info about RFC 66 here : > http://blog.springsource.com/2009/05/27/introduction-to-the-osgi-web-container/ > > Regards, > > Charles Moulliard > Senior Enterprise Architect > Apache Camel Committer > > ***************************** > blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard > Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard > > Apache Camel Group : > http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Valentin Mahrwald < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Charles, >> >> currently there is no WAB container in Apache Aries. The War to Wab >> converter was initially contributed as a piece towards implementing RFC66 >> but no further work has been done on that (as yet?). >> >> However, as part of the application management facilities I have just moved >> this code to the trunk. Now, I don't believe there is any documentation on >> it and even the javadoc is as yet non-existent for the most part. I intend >> to fix at least the latter part in the next week or so (I have raised >> ARIES-115 to cover it). >> >> Regards, >> >> Valentin >> >> >> On 12 Jan 2010, at 08:05, Charles Moulliard wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> Where can we find more info about WAR to WAB converter and added value of >>> WAB container ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Senior Enterprise Architect >>> Apache Camel Committer >>> >>> ***************************** >>> blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard >>> Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard >>> >>> Apache Camel Group : >>> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> I'm very tempted to suggest putting it out separately so people can >>>> choose not to consume it reasonably easily. Also I think it is likely >>>> that as we progress we may want to use it in more places and having it >>>> slightly to one size should make that simpler. >>>> >>>> Just my 2 cents worth. >>>> >>>> Alasdair >>>> >>>> 2010/1/11 Valentin Mahrwald <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> My current working set has a new converters project under application >>>>> >>>> primed >>>> >>>>> with the WarToWab conversions, but I suppose it could equally go into >>>>> the >>>>> existing management project. Any thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Valentin >>>>> >>>>> On 11 Jan 2010, at 21:04, Jarek Gawor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Valentin, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, great! Looking forward to your updates. Will the converter be in a >>>>>> separate module? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jarek >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Valentin Mahrwald >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jarek, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have started just yesterday moving it to the new BundleConverter API >>>>>>> but I >>>>>>> haven't come round to raise a JIRA for it yet :) I am quite happy to >>>>>>> continue with the task. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My idea was to take the code out of the context of the RFC 66 context >>>>>>> >>>>>> it >>>> >>>>> was >>>>>>> originally contributed since the RFC 66 bits weren't much more than >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> conversion logic anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Valentin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11 Jan 2010, at 20:38, Jarek Gawor wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is anyone planning to migrate the WAR to WAB converter donated by IBM >>>>>>>> to trunk any time soon? If not, and if there are no objections I can >>>>>>>> work on moving that code to trunk. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jarek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alasdair Nottingham >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >> >
