On 11 March 2010 18:10, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:48 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > >>> <snip> > > >>> Three points i'd like to stress: >>> * we need source distributions for everything we release because >>> this *is* the official release. >> >> +1 absolutely. I've just pulled in the Felix 'release' profile into >> the Aries parent pom. As a consequence LICENSE and NOTICE files need >> to be in SVN at every level. So, while adding them in at every >> 'releaseable' level seems like a manageability issue, I think their >> presence makes sure we remember that they are there and need to >> maintained accurately. >> > > Please undo this,
In fact this never made it into SVN ... and neither did any of the later talk of -project.zip. > I got the build to work so it produced a good set of > source bundles so you can build each subproject from the source bundle. > This is what apache policy requires and its really simple. What felix does > is antiquated and IMHO really bad practice. Please don't copy their build > stuff. If you're objecting to the -project.zip form then that's fine. I've been thinking about it a bit more and I actually think if someone is that desperate to build the source they'll anonymous svn checkout if they don't have an id. So I'm fine with the way it is now. Cheers, Jeremy > > thanks > david jencks > > > >
