I think the import package of org.osgi.framework.launch came from the
AriesBundleTrackerCustomizer in util package, as the blueprint
extender uses it optionally, when detecting the existence of composite
bundle factory service.

So it should be optional transitive dependency for blueprint, while it
is currently marked as required, which is incorrect.

Does this sound right?

Lin


On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 19:54, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think the framework launch may be used by the blueprint extender to
>> detect blueprint bundles in child frameworks or the
>> AriesBundleTracker, when we detect the framework provides
>> CompositeBundleFactory service (which is based on old RFC 138).   And
>> framework launch packages are provided by the osgi core 4.2 jar.  I
>> think it is ok if we put it as optional.
>
> I don't think that's the case.  The CompositeBundleFactory and
> everything related to composites are in the
> org.osgi.service.framework package.
> We need to try, but I think it's safe to remove that one.
>
>>>>  * org.osgi.framework.launch : no idea where this one come from, i
>>>> can't find any reference in the whole project
>>>
>>> cool lets remove it
>>
>>>>  * org.osgi.util.tracker : we may want to embed it
>>
>> This is provided by the osgi companion 4.2 jar.
>
> Yeah but we're trying to minimize the dependencies.  Given it's only a
> few classes and not a service we depend on, embedding those would
> remove the additional dependency.   The problem with the companion jar
> is that it is a big jar with optional imports.  If you don't deploy
> the servlet api for example, the compendium will still resolve, but
> later you might run into problems if you want to deploy servlets.
> You'd have to refresh your compendium, leading to a restart of all
> blueprint applications.
> Might be a bit overkill ...
>
>
>> Lin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>

Reply via email to