On Mar 11, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
On 11 March 2010 18:10, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:48 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
<snip>
Three points i'd like to stress:
* we need source distributions for everything we release because
this *is* the official release.
+1 absolutely. I've just pulled in the Felix 'release' profile into
the Aries parent pom. As a consequence LICENSE and NOTICE files need
to be in SVN at every level. So, while adding them in at every
'releaseable' level seems like a manageability issue, I think their
presence makes sure we remember that they are there and need to
maintained accurately.
Please undo this,
In fact this never made it into SVN ... and neither did any of the
later talk of -project.zip.
I got the build to work so it produced a good set of
source bundles so you can build each subproject from the source
bundle.
This is what apache policy requires and its really simple. What
felix does
is antiquated and IMHO really bad practice. Please don't copy
their build
stuff.
If you're objecting to the -project.zip form then that's fine. I've
been thinking about it a bit more and I actually think if someone is
that desperate to build the source they'll anonymous svn checkout if
they don't have an id. So I'm fine with the way it is now.
I haven't looked at what was proposed in detail.... but be sure you
are running
mvn clean install -Papache-release
to see what it generates; just mvn clean install won't produce the
artifacts needed for a release.
thanks
david jencks
Cheers,
Jeremy
thanks
david jencks
