The problem isn't that it makes sense or not, it's that in order to release aries, we'll have to have the aries plugin released before hand. So we'll have to release all the subprojects separatly (even if we do that under a single vote / staging repo and whatever else), but this means we'll have multiple tags.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 19:58, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote: > Patch looks good, assuming you can build eba-maven-plugin using the > init profile successfully. > > Does it make sense for us to release the eba-maven-plugin separately, > so that user doesn't have to build aries using the init profile first? > > Lin > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I did attach a file. > > > > Index: pom.xml > > =================================================================== > > --- pom.xml (revision 927124) > > +++ pom.xml (working copy) > > @@ -38,18 +38,6 @@ > > > > <modules> > > <module>parent</module> > > - <module>eba-maven-plugin</module> > > - <module>testsupport</module> > > - <module>util</module> > > - <module>blueprint</module> > > - <module>jndi</module> > > - <module>transaction</module> > > - <module>web</module> > > - <module>application</module> > > - <module>jmx</module> > > - <module>jpa</module> > > - <module>spi-fly</module> > > - <module>samples</module> > > </modules> > > > > <build> > > @@ -63,4 +51,37 @@ > > </plugins> > > </build> > > > > + > > + <profiles> > > + <profile> > > + <id>default</id> > > + <activation> > > + <activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault> > > + </activation> > > + <modules> > > + <module>testsupport</module> > > + <module>util</module> > > + <module>blueprint</module> > > + <module>jndi</module> > > + <module>transaction</module> > > + <module>web</module> > > + <module>application</module> > > + <module>jmx</module> > > + <module>jpa</module> > > + <module>spi-fly</module> > > + <module>samples</module> > > + </modules> > > + </profile> > > + > > + <profile> > > + <id>init</id> > > + <activation> > > + <activeByDefault>false</activeByDefault> > > + </activation> > > + <modules> > > + <module>eba-maven-plugin</module> > > + </modules> > > + </profile> > > + > > + </profiles> > > </project> > > > > On Mar 24, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Lin Sun wrote: > > > >> I think using profiles is fine or perhaps we can move the > >> eba-maven-plugin to its own tree/build and release the > >> eba-maven-plugin separately (which seems reasonable). > >> > >> P.S. did you intend to attach a file? anyway I don't see it. > >> > >> Lin > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Here's a possible fix using profiles. WDYT? > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Alan > >>> > >>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Lin Sun wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> I think I ran into similar issues yesterday when I tried to build with > >>>> a clean .m2 repo. I remember I had to manually build the > >>>> default-parent, parent, then eba-plugin to get around this. We'll > >>>> have to make sure we can build aries with a clean .m2 repo before we > >>>> release. > >>>> > >>>> Lin > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera < > [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm on a new tower and I tried to do a fresh build and it fails > because > >>>>> of a > >>>>> missing EBA plugin. I try to build the EBA plugin and it fails > because > >>>>> it's > >>>>> missing a parent. > >>>>> > >>>>> Shouldn't we control this build process via profiles at the SVN root? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Alan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
