It sounds like we are quite close to having the release ready so
perhaps we can release everything at the same time right now, and more
to a separate release model for subsequent releases?

Alasdair

On 24 March 2010 20:21, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> Right, I mean the eba maven plugin and its dependency out of the
> current trunk dir, unless we get rid of its current parent pom
> dependency.
>
> That way, we can have 2 releases, 2 votes and 2 tags, which is less
> overhead than each subproject has its own tag.  And if the eba plugin
> is stable, in a future release, we just need to do 1 release, 1 vote
> and 1 tag of aries trunk.
>
> Lin
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't think that would work, because the the eba maven plugin depends at
>> least on the parent poms, so we would need at least a release for those.
>> I don't see any real problems in having each subproject associated with its
>> own tag personally, but it's a bit more overhead when releasing the whole
>> thing.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 20:54, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to suggest things in a soft way :-)  I agree that we
>>> should release the eba plugin first.
>>>
>>> We could release the eba plugin first with a tag (after we move it out
>>> of the trunk dir), then release the other subprojects together with
>>> another tag.
>>>
>>> Lin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > The problem isn't that it makes sense or not, it's that in order to
>>> release
>>> > aries, we'll have to have the aries plugin released before hand.  So
>>> we'll
>>> > have to release all the subprojects separatly (even if we do that under a
>>> > single vote / staging repo and whatever else), but this means we'll have
>>> > multiple tags.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 19:58, Lin Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Patch looks good, assuming you can build eba-maven-plugin using the
>>> >> init profile successfully.
>>> >>
>>> >> Does it make sense for us to release the eba-maven-plugin separately,
>>> >> so that user doesn't have to build aries using the init profile first?
>>> >>
>>> >> Lin
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > I did attach a file.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Index: pom.xml
>>> >> > ===================================================================
>>> >> > --- pom.xml     (revision 927124)
>>> >> > +++ pom.xml     (working copy)
>>> >> > @@ -38,18 +38,6 @@
>>> >> >
>>> >> >     <modules>
>>> >> >         <module>parent</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>eba-maven-plugin</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>testsupport</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>util</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>blueprint</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>jndi</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>transaction</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>web</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>application</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>jmx</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>jpa</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>spi-fly</module>
>>> >> > -        <module>samples</module>
>>> >> >     </modules>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >     <build>
>>> >> > @@ -63,4 +51,37 @@
>>> >> >         </plugins>
>>> >> >     </build>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > +
>>> >> > +    <profiles>
>>> >> > +        <profile>
>>> >> > +            <id>default</id>
>>> >> > +            <activation>
>>> >> > +                <activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
>>> >> > +            </activation>
>>> >> > +            <modules>
>>> >> > +                <module>testsupport</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>util</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>blueprint</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>jndi</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>transaction</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>web</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>application</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>jmx</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>jpa</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>spi-fly</module>
>>> >> > +                <module>samples</module>
>>> >> > +            </modules>
>>> >> > +        </profile>
>>> >> > +
>>> >> > +        <profile>
>>> >> > +            <id>init</id>
>>> >> > +            <activation>
>>> >> > +                <activeByDefault>false</activeByDefault>
>>> >> > +            </activation>
>>> >> > +            <modules>
>>> >> > +                <module>eba-maven-plugin</module>
>>> >> > +            </modules>
>>> >> > +        </profile>
>>> >> > +
>>> >> > +    </profiles>
>>> >> >  </project>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Mar 24, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> I think using profiles is fine or perhaps we can move the
>>> >> >> eba-maven-plugin to its own tree/build and release the
>>> >> >> eba-maven-plugin separately (which seems reasonable).
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> P.S. did you intend to attach a file?  anyway I don't see it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Lin
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <
>>> [email protected]
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Here's a possible fix using profiles.  WDYT?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Regards,
>>> >> >>> Alan
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>> Hi
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> I think I ran into similar issues yesterday when I tried to build
>>> with
>>> >> >>>> a clean .m2 repo.  I remember I had to manually build the
>>> >> >>>> default-parent, parent, then eba-plugin to get around this.   We'll
>>> >> >>>> have to make sure we can build aries with a clean .m2 repo before
>>> we
>>> >> >>>> release.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Lin
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <
>>> >> [email protected]>
>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> I'm on a new tower and I tried to do a fresh build and it fails
>>> >> because
>>> >> >>>>> of a
>>> >> >>>>> missing EBA plugin.  I try to build the EBA plugin and it fails
>>> >> because
>>> >> >>>>> it's
>>> >> >>>>> missing a parent.
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Shouldn't we control this build process via profiles at the SVN
>>> root?
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>> Regards,
>>> >> >>>>> Alan
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Guillaume Nodet
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> > ------------------------
>>> > Open Source SOA
>>> > http://fusesource.com
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>



-- 
Alasdair Nottingham
[email protected]

Reply via email to