On Jun 25, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/25/13 10:53 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote: > >> The proposal originator said, "Although we represent law enforcement, >> and have brought forth this issue based upon our concerns and >> experience from a law enforcement perspective, this is a problem in >> which the entire ARIN community has a stake". > > If "law enforcement" is informed by the original agency of government > (ARPA or DARPA, or the NSF if originating is taken to mean the point > of delegation of the continuous operational practice of the address > and autonomous system number resource allocation to ARIN), then this > expression of policy interest would, in theory, be sufficiently well > informed. > > When the proposal originator has demonstrated that the "law > enforcement perspective" includes, and is controlled by, the purpose > of government at the time of delegation, from which the proposal > originator, of necessity, argues has been deviated from by the > delegated rule maker, ARIN, then consideration may be appropriate. Incorrect. Input into policy issues are welcome from all agencies of all governments, not simply those which may have unique authority aspects due to the history of the Internet Number Registry System. Please evaluate the proposed policy change on the basis of the arguments presented. Thanks, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
