This is just more re-arrangement of the deck chairs, but this one isn't going to go away regardless of a lack of support. It already had that.
It would probably be more workable if it were written as such: "Any organization requesting ARIN issued number resources or ASN's must provide ARIN with evidence of a legally established presence in the ARIN region. " And this is already the case. The use case for "majority" doesn't work. 2 of 3 is a majority. They're really looking for "substantial presence" more than majority if its truly an effort to weed out their definition of bad actors. There should be a real concern with false positives with the proposed language. And yes, the train left the station a decade ago re: use. Best, -M< On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:03 PM, George Herbert <[email protected]>wrote: > I am opposed to the overly vague "majority". I support organizations > getting space needs for customers or infrastructure within the ARIN region > from ARIN, regardless of where most of their operations are. > > There is some validity to the question of using those numbers for > customers or infrastructure elsewhere, but I believe that that train left > the station about a decade ago, and I think that attempting to cure it now > for this reason is not appropriate. > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Jun 25, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > John, >> > >> > A request from an agency of government other than the original >> > delegating agency may not take priority over the practice of the >> > original delegating agency, continued through delegation to another >> > entity. >> >> It certainly can be considered as valid input, not withstanding any >> prior relationship, when it is the policy of that government (USG >> in this case) to participate in ARIN's policy development process - >> >> "The USG participates in the development of and is supportive >> of the policies, processes, and procedures agreed upon by the >> Internet technical community through ARIN." >> >> "United States Government’s Internet Protocol Numbering Principles" >> < >> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2012/united-states-government-s-internet-protocol-numbering-principles >> > >> >> Please evaluate the proposed policy change on the basis of the arguments >> presented. >> >> Thanks! >> /John >> >> John Curran >> President and CEO >> ARIN >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> > > > > -- > -george william herbert > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
