On Jun 25, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
> The point I was offering, which you're free to continue to regard as > non-substantive, is that the interests of the Department of Defense, > articulated through its ARPA/DARPA/ARPA/DARPA agency, as well as the > interests of the National Science Foundation, and delegated as rule > making capacity to ARIN, are unconstrained by the jurisdictional > limitations on law enforcement agencies, federal or inferior. The > domestic law enforcement claims of Agency X do not, of necessity, > encompass the interests entrusted to ARIN. Correct, but this is not a request being made to ARIN with respect to any authority vested in ARIN by the USG. In many ways, we should all be thankful of that, since the USG use of the policy development process, just as everyone else, is far less likely to create interference with the desires of the community and/or ramifications for those not within US jurisdiction. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
