I don't want to beat this jurisdictional horse much more, but the 1973 allocation of addresses to the TIP at NORSAR, the first extra-territorial allocation of an ARPA address asset, did not arise from a request originating in the US Departments of Justice, or State.
Jurisdiction was not an original constraint on allocation. Subsequent allocations to the TIP in London, and later during the Defense Communications Agency management period to sites in the West Pacific and East Atlantic regions similarly did not arise from requests originating in the US Departments of Justice, or State. Jurisdiction as a constraint on allocation is proposed in the present. My point is that it is novel, not required, and not a substitute for existing law establishing nexus for a variety of ordinary business purposes, unrelated to addresses and routing. Eric _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
