On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, David Huberman <[email protected]> wrote: > The core issue is "should ARIN provide number resources to > networks whose customers and users are exclusively outside > the ARIN service region?"
Hi David, I made that mistake too and Terri corrected me: "Law enforcement simply wants [...] to avoid allocation to organizations/individuals who may intend to utilize IP address space for nefarious purposes, and that should this occur, accurate pointers (requested via subpoena) are available from ARIN for law enforcement to proceed with a criminal investigation." Put bluntly: they want a whodunit database indexed by IP address, and they'd prefer the identified criminals and evidence be accessible for arrest and seizure. If you want to write a proposal about whether addresses are actually employed in a technical capacity within the geographic ARIN service region, you'll choose different words and different concepts. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
