On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:21 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: ... > That is correct (and reflects current practice handling resource requests.)
John, I support the policy, but I do have a few questions that would help finalize my thinking (that I do not recall seeing asked or answered). I understand that any answers are going to be more WAGs than facts, and you may not have the information or ability to provide the answers, but any answers would help me (and perhaps others) recognize the implications of such a change (if any)? I'll accept as many additional caveats you want to add to any response. * If this policy was in place for (say) the last year, what is the order of magnitude of number of requests that would have been referred to another RIR (1, 10, 100, 1000)? * If this policy was in place for (say) the last year, can you break down the requests by the RIR that the requester appeared to be have their plurality? * If this policy was in place for (say) the last year, what is the order of magnitude of the IPv4 numbers that would not have been issued by ARIN (/24 ... /8)? Thanks. Gary _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
