Thank you for looking that up and inserting it, very useful! On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14-03-20 01:01 PM, Heather Schiller wrote: >> >> Remove from 8.2: >> "In the event that number resources of the combined organizations are no >> longer justified under ARIN policy at the time ARIN becomes aware of the >> transaction, through a transfer request or otherwise, ARIN will work >> with the resource holder(s) to return, aggregate, transfer, or reclaim >> resources as needed to restore compliance via the processes outlined in >> current ARIN policy." > > > I think this is important to keep in, so can we get the exact phrase that is > in conflict from the RSA Section 6 in this thread for comparison. I included > it, please adjust if not correct.. > > (Personally I would like to spend more time on the 'no longer justified > under ARIN Policy part..') > > RSA 6: REVIEW OF HOLDER'S NUMBER RESOURCES > Whenever a transfer or additional IP address space is requested by Holder, > ARIN may review Holder's utilization of previously allocated or assigned > number resources and other Services received from ARIN to determine if > Holder is complying with the Service Terms. Except as set forth in this > Agreement, > (i) ARIN will take no action to reduce the Services currently provided for > Included Number Resources due to lack of utilization by the Holder, and > (ii) ARIN has no right to revoke any Included Number Resources under this > Agreement due to lack of utilization by Holder. However, ARIN may refuse to > permit transfers or additional allocations of number resources > to Holder if Holder's Included Number Resources are not utilized in > accordance with Policy. > > I have more of a problem with the RSA statement...
agreed, if there is a direct conflict, then either policy changes, or the contract changes. Is it not an option to modify the RSA? > > ARIN Enforcement is a challenge enough, and with the dearth of IP, it seems > that there are many cases for reclaimation's. > > It can allow a loophole where people can hold on the the valuable resource, > and just play the transfer game .. to be avoided! -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
