On Mar 31, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Paul Timmins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on >> behalf of Martin Hannigan [[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:02 PM >> To: William Herrin >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal >> >>> I would NOT support this for the board. ARIN benefits from the board's >>> continuity. >> >> If you really want change, term limit the Board and forget the AC. > > Do people really WANT change though? I think part of what helps the community > at large is the predictability of policy w/r/t number allocation. > > A neutral entity controlling allocation uniformly per a generally stable > policy provides a good regulatory environment for everyone, I'd think. Further, in reality, if the voting constituency really wanted change, I suspect incumbents would be less likely to get re-elected. I know I certainly don’t vote for incumbents who I am dissatisfied with. I doubt anyone else does, either. Owen _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
