On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Jimmy Hess <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:21 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Change for change's sake is rarely for the better. Stability is > > Agreed. > >> >> > usually a good thing. I don't see rotating out AC members having a >> > negative impact on ARIN's overall stability. Frequent turnover on the >> > board, however... > > > I believe "term limits" to the AC currently to be a solution in search of a > problem.
Good for you. [ clip ] >> As far as term limits go, there are a multitude of organizations that >> use them and suffer little from it including federal, state and >> municipal governments, non profts like the Appalachian Mountain Club, >> NANOG, and many others. > > > These are much larger entities. There are a large number of people who > could serve on the board of a non-profit or governmental entity. > There are few who are even sufficiently familiar with the NRPM and technical > issues surrounding IP addressing policy to do the AC's job.. > What does that have to do with operating an open and transparent framework for all of us to do the work? Zip. [ clip ] > They are not ARIN. Many governmental, commercial, and non-profit > organizations take on their activities in a manner that would not > necessarily be appropriate for ARIN. > As tasty as red-herrings are, they're usually obvious. -M< _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
