A proposal has been submitted into the PDP process based upon feedback and breakout discussions that occurred at the last meeting. I believe this proposal may help with the issue which started this thread.
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/ARIN_prop_207_orig.html There is also another group of folks working on a proposal to update section 4.2.2 based upon feedback received at the meeting and the policy experience report (https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_33/PDF/monday/nobile_policy.pdf) presented at the meeting. I suspect we will also have another proposal submitted to the policy development process shortly. Andrew On 4/28/2014 5:16 PM, Steven Ryerse wrote: > I agree it is past time to do this as it is ARIN's reason to exist to > allocate. > > > Steven Ryerse > President > 100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338 > www.eclipse-networks.com > 770.656.1460 - Cell > 770.399.9099- Office > > ℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc. > Conquering Complex Networks℠ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of David Huberman > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 8:13 PM > To: Michael Peddemors; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Ip allocation > > Full support. Making a single ISP initial allocation criteria that opens a > /22 (or more!) to all first timers would be about 10 years past due, but > still helpful to the community ARIN serves. > > David R Huberman > Microsoft Corporation > Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS) > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of > Michael Peddemors <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:45:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Ip allocation > > Actually, this is timely, and you probably started at the right place, what > would be needed though is for someone to write up a draft resolution to this > affect, to change current policies. > > I was just talking to several parties regarding the same issue, and while > there might have been justification in the past, when routing issues were a > greater concern than running out of IPv4 space, but given the current > situation, maybe it is time to rethink this policy. > > In the mean time, you are faced in getting two upstream providers to route to > your prospective /22. I know, it doesn't make too much sense that the small > guy should bear the burden of extra costs etc.. for being honest about his > projected requirements.. > > Any other support out there for policy changes in this area? > > On 14-04-28 04:33 PM, Derek Calanchini wrote: >> Hello all, I will be brief as possible. I need assistance with either >> requesting a policy change or an appeal/exception to current policy. >> >> I started business in 1995 with 4 Class C's assigned from Integra ( >> /22 ). I am a full service IT provider offering pretty much >> everything but connectivity. Over the years I have developed my >> network such that I am using my IP's very efficiently. Host headers >> on most web sites, internal IP's whenever possible, and of course >> certain thing must be static, single IP's on a host. >> >> I am moving in less then a year to a new office, and taking the >> opportunity to get on the ATT fiber backbone rather then 4 bonded >> T-1's from Integra (which is very expensive) Integra tells me I can >> not take my IP's with me, and ATT tells me the largest block they will >> give me is a single class C. >> >> So I went out to Arin and setup my account and requested a /22 which >> was denied because the smallest block they will give a single homed >> ISP is a >> /20 (4096 ip's) >> >> I feel like I am being penalized for using my IP's efficiently!! As I >> see it, I only have one option: Rework my network so every site I >> host uses it's own dedicated IP so that I can justify needing a >> /20...in which case I feel I would be doing the internet community a >> disservice. >> >> Can anyone provided feedback on how to better resolve this? How do I >> start getting the policy changed? Is there a process I can go through >> to get an exemption? Would excalation my request be of any use? >> >> With the IP 4 space dwindling, wouldn't it be a better policy to allow >> small business to get only what they need? >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> Derek Calanchini >> Owner >> Creative Network Solutions >> Phone: 916-852-2890 >> Fax: 916-852-2899 >> >> "Adopt the metric system!" >> >> CNS LOGO >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> <http://www.avast.com/> >> >> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus >> <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active. >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >> > > > -- > "Catch the Magic of Linux..." > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc. > Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca "LinuxMagic" a > Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada > > This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. > Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely > those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public > Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public > Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
