Derek,

On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Derek Calanchini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here are some answers you may have missed:
> 1.
> Arin said the smallest I could request was a /20, I was requesting a /22.  My 
> current /22 is currently owned by Integra...I procured them from Electric 
> Lightwave before they got eaten by Integra.
> 
> So what does legacy mean? 

It means it was allocated prior to the requirement of entering into a 
Registration Services Agreement.

> Arin told me that Integra owned the IP's I am using.  Would it be possible to 
> strong arm them into letting me reassign them to ATT?

Unlikely, but large amounts of money might help convince them. I suspect this 
approach isn't of interest however.

> 2.
> I did put in the request that I was going to surrender my current /22 after 
> migration to the newly requested /22.

Not relevant. The applicable policy is quite clear: you need to "demonstrate 
need" for a /20, something that will be a bit challenging for you at this point.

> 3.
> This seems to cover it:
> 
> https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_33/PDF/monday/nobile_policy.pdf
> (is this the draft to prop 207??)

No, that's a presentation that is providing information to the community 
regarding ARIN staff's experiences in implementing the policies the community 
has developed. One of the things Leslie (the head of registration services) was 
pointing out was that there were ... issues with existing policy.

I believe "prop 207" being referenced is 
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/ARIN_prop_207_orig.html.  I'm guessing 
Martin's concerns is that policy proposal is way more complicated than what you 
need.  What you appear to need is revising 4.3.2.1 of the NRPM to say /22 
instead of /20.

> Is there anything I can do to speed this along?  Seriously, I will do 
> authoring, leg work, make calls...whatever it takes!

To be honest, so far, you are seeing something approaching light speed in the 
RIR policy world.  IIUC, what some folks are suggesting is that the ARIN Board 
step in and modify policy to address this particular issue before the next ARIN 
meeting (in Bellevue, WA in early June).  This would be somewhat similar to 
tunneling through a wormhole...

Regards,
-drc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to