"Use of the registry database for policy enforcement is not supportive of the 
primary reason for the existence of the registry system (there is a reason it's 
called a "registry").  It is also self-defeating.  Get enough folks doing 
"transfers" outside of registry database and the database is no longer 
meaningful."



Yup, I suppose....and I guess it's no fault blaming those individuals who do 
not heed the community's standards by going outside of policy....no, let's 
consider ARIN to be at fault for responding to community consensus.  

Hi Bill,
We consider ARIN policy to be at fault and are seeking community consensus to 
change that policy, Do you have a problem with that approach?



I know that what this back and forth is about....policy discussion and 
development....to see whether the community has had a see change...but what I 
see is that a few people who want it their way...continue to flame the status 
quo for maintaining its focus...to my mind...where it still should be.  Scare 
resource? Given them to people who NEED them. If the community should be 
outrage about something, it should be those who contribute to the weakness of 
he database, not those who's stewardship has not failed.


bd


Bill, nobody is *giving* addresses to anybody, regardless of their NEEDS, so 
you can disabuse yourself of that pie-eyed notion. And what is flaming the 
status quo? Way to encourage participation. I suppose it’s better to leave the 
community in their repose of silent focus. 

Let’s cut out the stewardship failed nonsense, you are accusing both RIPE and 
APNIC communities of failed stewardship because their opinion doesn’t match 
your personal one.

Regards,
Mike






On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:50 AM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:

  Gary and Bill, 

  On Jun 12, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Bill Darte <[email protected]> wrote:


    Gary said...
      "need" is not the same as "want" (see the
      $10K red button app that was offered for
      awhile; can anyone explain why anyone
      would "need" it).  And while some may
      exchange money for only "want"s, those
      that can demonstrate "need" can get those
      transfers approved today and have the
      registry updated today.  Only the "wants"
      are having a hard time.  And, in my opinion,
      that is as it should be.

    big +1


  While I consider the angst associated with speculators (or whoever) buying up 
all the address space overblown (hint: it would merely shorten the already 
short time horizon of when IPv4 addresses are no longer practically available), 
the issue I'm most concerned with is "and have the registry updated today."

  I do not believe given sufficient "want" and money that the lack of updating 
the registry would sufficient deterrent to preclude a "transfer" from 
occurring.  The end result being that the address space is no longer traceable 
after the transfer.

  Use of the registry database for policy enforcement is not supportive of the 
primary reason for the existence of the registry system (there is a reason it's 
called a "registry").  It is also self-defeating.  Get enough folks doing 
"transfers" outside of registry database and the database is no longer 
meaningful.

  I would have no issue with using other tools at ARIN's disposal for policy 
enforcement, e.g., removing reverse delegations, marking entries in the 
database as "out of policy" and letting ISPs decide for themselves whether to 
accept a prefix for routing, invoking contractual penalties, etc. 

  Regards,
  -drc




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to