On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:25:12PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >
> > Matthew Kaufman
> >
> > ps. I'd also note that "policy that expresses the general intent of the
> > community" may in fact *be* policy that lets post-runout transfers be
> > performed without a needs test, as "the community" consists of a lot more
> > than "Owen?.
>
> Indeed, it does. However, many people have also repeatedly stood
> up in defense of needs basis, so singling me out as if I am the
> lone supporter of preserving needs basis is as specious as many of
> your other arguments.
Speaking for myself here on PPML as I've done since the list got spun
up, I can shockingly say "I agree with Owen".
See the PPC transcript for what I and my colleagues had to say about
the proposal, which was amusingly based on an utterly false problem
statement.
If we need to streamline the needs evaluation, that's a different
kettle of fish. Throwing it out is a mistake.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / CotSG / Usenix / NANOG
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
