So I don't get something: If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of many XL networks, almost all of whom would be immediately eligible for more space even though they weren't eligible previously?
I feel like in missing something. David R Huberman Microsoft Corporation Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS) ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of ARIN <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:53:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2014-17: Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate - revised Draft Policy ARIN-2014-17 Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate ARIN-2014-17 has been revised. Draft Policy ARIN-2014-17 is below and can be found at: https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_17.html You are encouraged to discuss the merits and your concerns of Draft Policy 2014-17 on the Public Policy Mailing List. The AC will evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet Number Resource Policy as stated in the PDP. Specifically, these principles are: * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration * Technically Sound * Supported by the Community The ARIN Policy Development Process (PDP) can be found at: https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at: https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Draft Policy ARIN-2014-17 Change Utilization Requirements from last-allocation to total-aggregate Date: 14 July 2014 Problem Statement: Current ARIN policy calculates utilization on a per allocation basis rather than in aggregate. This method of determining utilization may cause some organizations to be unable to qualify for additional address blocks despite attempting to use their resource allocations as best as possible. This issue has been exacerbated in the past couple of years due to the 3-month allocation window which causes organizations to receive smaller non-expandable allocations rather than a larger aggregate. For example, if an organization has 4 x /22 and 3 of them are utilized 100% and the fourth utilized at 75%, an additional allocation request would be denied. However, an organization with a single /20 utilized at 80% would have less efficient utilization but would be eligible to receive additional space. Policy statement: Update Section 4.2.4.1 ISPs must have efficiently utilized all allocations, in aggregate, to at least 80% in order to receive additional space. This includes all space reassigned to their customers. Update Section 4.3.6.1 End-users must have efficiently utilized all assignments, in aggregate, to at least 80% in order to receive additional space, and must provide ARIN with utilization details. Comments: a. Timetable for implementation: Immediate b. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
