Jeff, I respectfully disagree with your assessment of this draft policy. The draft policy as written applies to all organizations which receive space from ARIN and would change how utilization is calculated for organizations which receive space as end-users or ISPs regardless of size.
Andrew On 7/14/2014 3:45 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: > Correct, this proposal makes more small networks with fragmented > networks eligible to request space. It does nothing for large > networks. > > Thanks, Jeff > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Gary Buhrmaster > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2014 7:02 PM, "David Huberman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> So I don't get something: >>> >>> If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of many XL networks, >>> almost all of whom would be immediately eligible for more space even though >>> they weren't eligible previously? >>> >>> I feel like in missing something. >> No, I think you have it. The issue this proposal tries to fix for some >> smaller networks has the (I presume) unintended side effect of letting >> $megaisp$ acquire additional numbers immediately. Perhaps some contorted >> language could "fix" that without other side effects, but the edges get >> complicated. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. > > _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
