Correct, this proposal makes more small networks with fragmented networks eligible to request space. It does nothing for large networks.
Thanks, Jeff On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Gary Buhrmaster <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2014 7:02 PM, "David Huberman" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> So I don't get something: >> >> If it's 80% overall, wouldn't this have an affect on of many XL networks, >> almost all of whom would be immediately eligible for more space even though >> they weren't eligible previously? >> >> I feel like in missing something. > > No, I think you have it. The issue this proposal tries to fix for some > smaller networks has the (I presume) unintended side effect of letting > $megaisp$ acquire additional numbers immediately. Perhaps some contorted > language could "fix" that without other side effects, but the edges get > complicated. > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. -- Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP-ISSMP Fellow, Black Lotus Communications mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: [email protected] | skype: blacklotus.net _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
