On Sep 30, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > >>> Reading between the lines, I think this is about ARIN's max carrying rate >>> without schedule slippage. > >> We actually have been fairly creative (e.g. moving IPv6 and ASN > requests to additional resources to free up more time for IPv4 > requests); there are other similar options if needed, so I'm > going to disagree on that assertion of a "max carrying rate." > > I'm going to disagree on on your disagreement, because what I wrote is > clearly not an assertion! > It's nice to know you have options to speed things up, though. > Thanks for the info, it is clear to me that given your definition of "out" as > the first waiting list entry, we will almost certainly have a thousand blocks > left when we're "out." > Does team review come to an end when the first waiting list entry is > registered?
Mike - If an extremely large and fast growing ISP were to qualify for an IPv4 /9 allocation today, then NRPM 4.1.8 (Unmet Need) would be in effective. Regardless of their choice (smaller block or waiting list), there would still be other IPv4 requestors who should be entitled to receive resources from the remaining free pool so long as they submit a complete and valid request before other requestors. The team review provides for serialization of requests which makes this possible, and hence it should continue even if one requestor has unmet need. Even after completion depletion, parties will want to know that they are being approved and placed on the list in the appropriate order. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
