On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 6:16 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Dec 26, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ...
>

[ snip ]



    We've had this question arise in the past with other trade
> organizations,
>     and have been consistent in its application, whether with regard to
> address
>     policy for individual sectors of ARIN's region or individual
> technologies such
>     as hosting and wireless.   Please feel free to share any
> recommendations
>     from the OIX community that might be germane to address policy, but it
> is
>     also advisable for those who wish to actually participate in the ARIN
> policy
>     development process to do so on the PPML mailing list.
>
>
Many that are part of the OIX community have already stated their aversion
to joining the noise heavy mailing list in order to comment once or twice a
year. As far as trade association inter communications, do you have a
written guidance on this supported by the Board? It would be good to
clarify exactly how trade organizations should provide input to "ARIN" on
behalf of their members and if that will not be valid - in writing. It
would likely help to make the case to consider participating in other ways
where there is [currently] aversion.

Best,

-M<
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to