On Dec 29, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:30 PM, John Curran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Dec 29, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: ... Curran is inaccurate from my viewpoint. That's the unilateral approach that probably doesn't work for ARIN as a whole. I don't see any of the limits he mentions codified e.g. the NANOG PPCs aren't codified in the PDP.
Martin - I already noted that per the Policy Development Process, policy discussions take place on the PPML mailing list and at PPCs. Regarding where PPCs occur, please again reference the PPC definition within the Policy Development Process <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html> - "Public Policy Consultation (PPC) An open public discussion held by ARIN of Internet number resource policy that provides for the contemporaneous interaction and polling of in-person and remote participants. These consultations may be held at ARIN's Public Policy Meetings and at other related forums as approved by the ARIN Board of Trustees.” Thank for underscoring my point about the lack of clarity. Actually, it’s quite clearly laid out in the Policy Development Process [i.e. that the PPML mailing list and Public Policy Consultations (PPC) are the input to be considered and the definition of what is a PPC], but do not hesitate to ask if you have any further confusion in this area. The discussion has transcended OIX and is about ARIN and whether it wants open and transparent internet governance inputs from outside parties that have recognized expertise. ARIN welcomes input into the policy development process and even has a structured process for gathering formal input into the policy development via consultations at other related forums, such as those which have recognized expertise. If OIX believes that a Public Policy Consultation at an OIX meeting is desired, please let me know. In the meantime, please feel free to have the OIX community express their view on the PPML mailing list or at a Public Policy Consultations (which occur presently at ARIN and NANOG meetings) - As I noted before, it’s quite likely that input on draft policies from the OIX would be rather influential in the development of address policies related to data center and exchange point environments. Please take a look at Dr. Muellers comments. They may be helpful to you. I reviewed the comments quite carefully, and I believe that Milton made quite clear how he would consider such comments when determining community support. Each AC member weights the question of community support when deciding to recommend a policy change, based on their best understanding of the discussion on PPML mailing list and at the Public Policy Consultations. Milton also indicated that that is it extremely important and useful when people bring relevant views from other communities, and as I’ve noted several times, I do agree that such views are likely to be influential in the policy development process, but only to the extant that they are brought into the policy discussion. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
