On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:30 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > Curran is inaccurate from my viewpoint. That's the unilateral approach > that probably doesn't work for ARIN as a whole. I don't see any of the > limits he mentions codified e.g. the NANOG PPCs aren't codified in the PDP. > > > > Martin - > > I already noted that per the Policy Development Process, policy > discussions > take place on the PPML mailing list and at PPCs. Regarding where PPCs > occur, please again reference the PPC definition within the Policy > Development > Process <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html> - > > "Public Policy Consultation (PPC) > > An open public discussion held by ARIN of Internet number resource > policy that provides for the contemporaneous interaction and polling of > in-person and remote participants. These consultations may be held at > ARIN's Public Policy Meetings and at other related forums as approved by > the ARIN Board of Trustees." > Thank for underscoring my point about the lack of clarity. The discussion has transcended OIX and is about ARIN and whether it wants open and transparent internet governance inputs from outside parties that have recognized expertise. Please take a look at Dr. Muellers comments. They may be helpful to you. FYI, -M<
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
