On Tue, 26 May 2015, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/26/15 13:30, David Huberman wrote:
Why is another region's policy problem or restrictions something that
needs
>fixing through ARIN policy?
Two answers:
Because ARIN-region networks, subject to ARIN's NRPM, need to be able to
move IP addresses out of region where and when they're needed.
AND
Because ARIN policy currently prohibits staff from counting out-of-region
use as part of justification for a request.
If I am to take an ARIN centric approach I have to ask why I should care
about problems in other regions that sound like they could solved by
requesting resources from that region.
If you were an ARIN member operating a global network, you probably
wouldn't feel that way. I'd argue "many" who do so, but I only have
first-hand knowledge of a few ARIN members who do so, prefer as much as
possible to deal with one RIR (one set of rules/regulations to keep up
with, common language and currency) for their IP space needs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
